<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The right graph, at the right time</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bioinformaticszen.com/2007/02/the-right-graph-at-the-right-time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bioinformaticszen.com/2007/02/the-right-graph-at-the-right-time/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Efrat</title>
		<link>http://www.bioinformaticszen.com/2007/02/the-right-graph-at-the-right-time/#comment-11667</link>
		<dc:creator>Efrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 09:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioinformaticszen.com/2007/02/the-right-graph-at-the-right-time/#comment-11667</guid>
		<description>Hello,

I am looking for information regarding the biological meaning behind graph trends. Whenever I get a set of results, I am not sure which trend to choose to describe it. I think that the common idea of finding the best matching trend (with the highest r square value) might be a mistake, because there has to be a difference in the meaning of, let's say, exponential trend vs. 4th degree polynomial trend. I would like to receive a link for information that might help me clarify this issue better.

Thank you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>I am looking for information regarding the biological meaning behind graph trends. Whenever I get a set of results, I am not sure which trend to choose to describe it. I think that the common idea of finding the best matching trend (with the highest r square value) might be a mistake, because there has to be a difference in the meaning of, let&#8217;s say, exponential trend vs. 4th degree polynomial trend. I would like to receive a link for information that might help me clarify this issue better.</p>
<p>Thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.bioinformaticszen.com/2007/02/the-right-graph-at-the-right-time/#comment-979</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 11:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioinformaticszen.com/2007/02/the-right-graph-at-the-right-time/#comment-979</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comment Mr Gunn. I guess the point I was trying to make is that sometimes, especially in presentations, showing too much data can dilute out your message. Showing too many graphs can be overwhelming for an audience. I say this from my own personal experience of watching presentations.

Everyone has a different style of course, but I would say try to limit the amount of graphs and charts you use. When you do use them to illustrate a point, they will have more impact.

I hope this makes things clearer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment Mr Gunn. I guess the point I was trying to make is that sometimes, especially in presentations, showing too much data can dilute out your message. Showing too many graphs can be overwhelming for an audience. I say this from my own personal experience of watching presentations.</p>
<p>Everyone has a different style of course, but I would say try to limit the amount of graphs and charts you use. When you do use them to illustrate a point, they will have more impact.</p>
<p>I hope this makes things clearer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Gunn</title>
		<link>http://www.bioinformaticszen.com/2007/02/the-right-graph-at-the-right-time/#comment-950</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Gunn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 18:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioinformaticszen.com/2007/02/the-right-graph-at-the-right-time/#comment-950</guid>
		<description>I'm not sure I understand the point you're making in your example.  Are you saying that sometimes it's better to not show the data, and simply state your interpretation instead?

That might be appropriate for some situations analogous to "data not shown" in papers, but certainly you would have to show the actual data for most things, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure I understand the point you&#8217;re making in your example.  Are you saying that sometimes it&#8217;s better to not show the data, and simply state your interpretation instead?</p>
<p>That might be appropriate for some situations analogous to &#8220;data not shown&#8221; in papers, but certainly you would have to show the actual data for most things, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bioinformatics Zen &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Using graphs in presentations and keeping your message simple</title>
		<link>http://www.bioinformaticszen.com/2007/02/the-right-graph-at-the-right-time/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Bioinformatics Zen &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Using graphs in presentations and keeping your message simple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 20:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioinformaticszen.com/2007/02/the-right-graph-at-the-right-time/#comment-33</guid>
		<description>[...] The slides included a couple of graphs, and since I&#8217;ve mentioned graphs in presentations previously I thought I&#8217;d include a few slides here. The presentation might appear minimal, but I was [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The slides included a couple of graphs, and since I&#8217;ve mentioned graphs in presentations previously I thought I&#8217;d include a few slides here. The presentation might appear minimal, but I was [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.bioinformaticszen.com/2007/02/the-right-graph-at-the-right-time/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 00:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioinformaticszen.com/2007/02/the-right-graph-at-the-right-time/#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the tip and compliment, albrecht. I hadn't heard of gnuplot. Looks like it's worth a look too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the tip and compliment, albrecht. I hadn&#8217;t heard of gnuplot. Looks like it&#8217;s worth a look too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: albrecht</title>
		<link>http://www.bioinformaticszen.com/2007/02/the-right-graph-at-the-right-time/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>albrecht</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2007 03:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioinformaticszen.com/2007/02/the-right-graph-at-the-right-time/#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Hello, 

another program, really good for graphs, is the gnuplot.
The only problem, is that they dont plot pie graphs, but, as did you say before, pie graphs arent good for present informations.

Bye and congratulations for the good blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, </p>
<p>another program, really good for graphs, is the gnuplot.<br />
The only problem, is that they dont plot pie graphs, but, as did you say before, pie graphs arent good for present informations.</p>
<p>Bye and congratulations for the good blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.bioinformaticszen.com/2007/02/the-right-graph-at-the-right-time/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 09:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioinformaticszen.com/2007/02/the-right-graph-at-the-right-time/#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the tip, Terry.
I've heard this book mentioned before , checking out amazon it's got rave reviews.
If you've got the time &lt;a href="http://www.presentationzen.com/presentationzen/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Presentation Zen&lt;/a&gt; has a list of recommended books - about half way down the page in the right column.
Your recommendation is there, along with a few other books by Edward R. Tufte too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the tip, Terry.<br />
I&#8217;ve heard this book mentioned before , checking out amazon it&#8217;s got rave reviews.<br />
If you&#8217;ve got the time <a href="http://www.presentationzen.com/presentationzen/" rel="nofollow">Presentation Zen</a> has a list of recommended books - about half way down the page in the right column.<br />
Your recommendation is there, along with a few other books by Edward R. Tufte too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Delaney</title>
		<link>http://www.bioinformaticszen.com/2007/02/the-right-graph-at-the-right-time/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Delaney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 19:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bioinformaticszen.com/2007/02/the-right-graph-at-the-right-time/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Readers are advised to look at Edward R. Tufte's book* for many examples of effective presentation of numerical data, and advice on avoiding so-called "chartjunk."  The books are even fun to read.

Terry Delaney, The University of Vermont

*The visual display of quantitative information / Edward R. Tufte. 2nd ed. Cheshire, Conn., Graphics Press, c2001.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Readers are advised to look at Edward R. Tufte&#8217;s book* for many examples of effective presentation of numerical data, and advice on avoiding so-called &#8220;chartjunk.&#8221;  The books are even fun to read.</p>
<p>Terry Delaney, The University of Vermont</p>
<p>*The visual display of quantitative information / Edward R. Tufte. 2nd ed. Cheshire, Conn., Graphics Press, c2001.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.276 seconds -->
