Tom, Dick, and Harry are collaborating on a paper. Tom, being the PhD student, does all the work and then writes the paper. Tom then sends a copy to Dick and Harry who edit it with their opinions. Unfortunately Dick completely removes the second paragraph of the discussion, while Harry expands it. Both then send their edited copies back to Tom.
In my opinion, great coding skills, a thorough knowledge of statistics, and Shakespearian writing ability do not make a great bioinformatician. They help, but the most important things are a relevant scientific question and a good understanding of the literature. If you’re like me, the path to scientific enlightenment begins with typing keywords into PubMed until you get the results you were after - the same way you use Google. However the are other options besides PubMed, here are six other options you might not have heard of, worth a look perhaps?